Should A Fatal Claim Petition Be Denied When Decedent’s Death Did Not Occur Within 300 Weeks Of The Original Work Injury?

Unfortunately, the answer to this is yes, pursuant to a Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Opinion in Whitesell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Staples, Inc.), No. 205 C.D. 2013 dated July 10, 2013. Decedent suffered a low back injury on October 15, 2003 while working for Staples. After two spinal surgeries, he filed a Petition to Review to challenge the originally accepted “lumbar sprain/strain” diagnoses on the Notice of Compensation Payable. The Employer agreed to amend the diagnoses to include lumbar disc disruption L4-L5 resulting in total disc arthroplasty at L4-L5. Decedent died June 13, 2010 as a result of mixed drug toxicity from medication prescribed by the treating physician. A Fatal Claim Petition was filed on June 8, 2011 and the Employer denied the allegations claiming the death did not occur within 300 weeks of the original injury as required by Section 301(c)(1) of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act.

The Workers’ Compensation Judge and the Appeal Board denied the Claim Petition, holding that the Fatal Claim is barred by 301(c)(1) of the Act. Decedent contended that the term “injury” for purposes of the 300 week limitation should mean the original injury in addition to any other injuries which occurred as a result of the original injury. As such, the 300 week limitation to file a death claim starts from the date that the additional injuries occurred.

The Commonwealth Court discussed Shoemaker v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Jenmar Corporation), 604 A.2d 1145 (Pa. Cmwlth.), appeal denied, 533 Pa. 614, 615, 618 A.2d 403, 404 (1992), and found that it cannot be meaningfully distinguished from the circumstances in the instant case. In Shoemaker, a claimant was injured in a tractor-trailer accident in February 1980, had surgeries and received blood transfusions resulting in AIDS and death in July 1987. The Fatal Claim Petition was likewise barred there, as it was here, and for the same reasons. The Court concluded that it was irrelevant that the Decedent’s work injury was legally expanded by the Work Comp Judge in 2006, and that the additional injury, even if “insidious” and not “standard”, doesn’t carve out an exception to 300 week limit.

Is this Decision fair? NO!! It was clear that Decedent’s death was causally related to the original injury.  Why does the original injury date rule the day? The drugs which caused the death were directly related to the work injury/surgery. The 300 weeks should begin to run from the most recent work-related diagnosis or injury so long as it is connected to the original injury.

If you have any questions about Pennsylvania Work Comp Law, call or email me 7 days a week.

Certified Specialist in Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s